The Consecration Requested by Our Lady in the Apparitions of Fatima and the Providential Mission of Russia

By IGM at  translated by Michael Fuller source: Non Possumus

it can also be found here:

http://op54rosary.ning.com/forum/topics/the-consecration-requested-by-our-lady-of-fatima-and-the-pNSFatimaIconorovide

The Icon of Our Lady of Fatima in Russia

The consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, requested by the Virgin in the apparitions to the little shepherds of Fatima is still a topic that lends itself to controversy, denials and debates. We believe it is not an issue that remains in the past, but, on the contrary, each day it becomes more relevant to our times. Rather we attest that it raises the issue that the enemies firmly established within the conciliar church, which sedevacantists claim to oppose, disdain and disregard.

In the third apparition at Fatima, July 13, 1917, the Blessed Virgin, after having showed the fate of the condemned souls in Hell, told the three shepherd children the following:

“You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them[the souls of poor sinners who are on their way to hell], God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace. The war is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the Pontificate of Pope Pius XI. When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask

for the Consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays. If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated.”

The relationship between the mention of Russia in the message and the Bolshevik Revolution which took place a little later that year, was clear and as such the association between the evils of atheistic Communism that the revolution sought to spread throughout the world and the consecration of Russia was evident. The message is more than clear about this.

However, in this apparition Our Lady did not ask for the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart. There she announced that she would return to request it. She did shortly after in 1929. Why? What is the relationship between that year and the request of the consecration? If 1917 is marked by the apparition in Fatima and the Bolshevik Revolution, events which can and should be in relation to each other, what sense does it make or what did Heaven want us to know with the explicit request of the consecration of Russia made in 1929?

But before going into this question, first let us take a look at this request. On the 13th of June, 1929, Sister Lucy of Fatima, while a novitiate of the St. Dorothy Sisters in Tuy, Spain, witnessed another apparition of Our Lady, who was returning to fulfill that of the one announced in 1917. This is what was said by Our Lady to Sister Lucy:

“The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means. So numerous are the souls which the justice of God condemns for sins committed against Me, that I come to ask for reparation. Sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.”

It is known that the consecration of Russia, as it had been requested by Our Lady, was never carried out. There were consecrations of the world, but not the exclusive consecration of Russia by the Pope in union with all of the bishops of the world.

Some believe or teach that this consecration is no longer needed, since Russia has already spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church, so it would be useless to do the consecration.

Is this true?

The conclusion of the Secret of Fatima is:

“In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world.”

But before that happens, there will be a great chastisement for the Church and the world.
This chastisement, according to the divine message, will begin in Russia:
“If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated.”

However, the two opposing positions to the consecration of Russia give their reasons: the Liberals say it is not necessary since Communism has fallen in Russia; and some sedevacantists, that Russia has already chastised the world in the spreading of Communism, so the consecration would be unnecessary. For some, then, the request of the Virgin would have already been successfully fulfilled; for others, the chastisement arrived, so everything has come to pass.

Perhaps, to better understand the implications of the message, you have to think about the following: what is it that Russia will spread around the world? What are these errors? The answer seems obvious: Communism. But, what is Communism? Not an ideology, not a philosophy, not an economic system, not a form of government. It is indeed this: “a conspiracy for revolution”. And this revolution ends in diabolical hatred of God.

We have taken the definition of Communism given in one of the key documents for understanding the revolution in the modern world, especially that of the history of the last hundred years. We refer to the “Rakovsky interrogation”, also known as ” the Red Symphony” (the document that can be read on this is available in summary here or in full here).

What is it about?

In 1938, the Soviet secret police, the NKVD, during one of Stalin’s purges against their trotskyist enemies, conducted an interrogation on the masonic Illuminati agent Christian Rakovsky, a reputed first class conspirator, partner of Trotsky in the Russian Revolution, and ambassador of Moscow in Paris. Rakovsky is dealt with for an entire night, his life was at risk, with revelations that should have never come to light, but became known by extraordinary circumstances. This agent of the Rothschild’s explains for example that: “The aim of the Revolution is no less than to redefine reality in terms of the interests of the bankers. This involves the promotion of subjective truth over objective truth.” It is discovered that the power of money (“international imperialism of money” coined by Pope Pius XI) is what has been funding the anti-Christian revolutions and Communism from the very beginning. Regarding the revolution in Russia and the international banks having lost control of Stalin, the same international banks that financed the Soviet Revolution then financed Hitler in order to oppose the “Bonapartist” tyrant who had interrupted the rapid globalization of the revolution and took out Trotsky, and he was also soon out of action because of a deadly disease. They thus opened the way to a war on two fronts, whose ultimate goal was to expand the Communist revolution on a global scale. Then they loss control of Hitler, who began to issue his own money against the interests of international banks, forcing them to make an alliance with Stalin. Two dates are key in this revolutionary process; one on the 25th of October 1917, and the other on the 24th of October, 1929.

In the words of Rakovsky:

“Remember the morning of the 24th of October, 1929. The time will come when this day will be for the history of the revolution more important than October 1917. On the day of the 24th October there took place the crash of the New York Stock Exchange, the beginning of the so-called ‘depression’, a real revolution.

“Take note of the following: In that year 1929 the first year of the American revolution, in February Trotsky leaves Russia; the crash takes place in October…the financing of Hitler is agreed in July 1929. You think that all this was by chance? The four years of the rule of Hoover was used for the preparation for the seizure of power in the United States and USSR; there by means of a financial revolution, and here [Russia] with the help of war and the defeat [of Stalin] which was to follow…”

If the revolution had triumphed in 1917 in Russia, it was in 1929 when it triumphed completely in the USA and thus began the successful global expansion of the errors which arose in Russia. Although one might think that already in 1913 with the fraudulent foundation of the Federal Reserve, the revolutionary and international usury had won by implanting itself into the economic levers of the country, it was in 1929 when the “American Classic” was enslaved to Wall Street and its moral crushed.

Exactly in between those two events that occurred that year, the departure of Trotsky, Rothschild agent to the USA, and the crash of October, there was the apparition of the Virgin in Tuy. Shortly after her request, the bankers agreed to finance Hitler, a preparation of World War.

We should also pay attention to this detail, which seems significant: the interrogation of Rakovsky was held on the night of the 25th to the 26th of January, 1938 (from 9 pm to 3 am in Western European time). In other words, the interview began after the appearance of the unknown light which Our Lady had announced would be seen in the sky as a warning and an announcement of the next war!

That war was being announced by an Illuminati agent that very night. It was a war driven by the world communist revolution, whose arm was in Moscow, but whose brain resided in the United States (although both countries were pawns of the Zionist Jews, remember that in the same week that produced the Soviet Revolution the “Balfour Declaration” was materialized in London, which opened the doors to Zionism for the future occupation of Palestine). All this was allowed by Providence as a chastisement to the rebellious men to God.

So then if we inevitably link the announcement of 1917 with the Russian revolution, we can relate the request made in 1929 with the other revolution of 1929, or rather, the other stage of the same revolution. This is because those responsible were the same, with the sole purpose of ending all vestiges of the Christian order and the Catholic Church. To achieve this they had to to work clandestinely ad intra the Church, on the one hand (they would triumph in the October Revolution of Vatican II, which started an October 11, 1962) and ad extra corrupting and crushing society’s heirs of the Roman order of Christianity.

But then, why did Our Lady not request the consecration of the USA but only of Russia? Has it not been the more successful model of the corruption of Anglo-American-Zionist wickedness than the formal system of Russian Communism, outdated since 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall?

The answer is this: Russia has a providential mission in history.

Universalism is a constant in its history and no one can deny that Communism is gaining strength or that it is valued in a country that not only has an imperial vocation, but also feels destined to perform universal “redemption”. Since the days of the czars, the Russians have believed they were destined to save Europe. Tsar Alexander I fought against the doctrines of the French Revolution. On several occasions Russia was a defensive safeguard for Christianity. “No other people have felt so sharp and instinctive for not having done anything for this world”, says Fr. Alfredo Sáenz in his book “De la Rus’ de Vladimir al ‘Hombre nuevo’ sovietico” . Vladimir Soloviev spoke about the historical and religious mission of Russia. “The distinctively religious character of the Russian people as well as the mystical tendency exhibited in our philosophy, our literature and our arts seem to indicate for Russia a great religious mission.”(Russia and the Universal Church, op.cit.) He also stated that the special vocation of Russia was “a power capable of taking up the work of Constantine and Charlemagne with better hope of success”(cfr. op. cit.). Dostoevsky also took care to emphasize the universal mission of Russia. Moreover, the threat of Russia to Europe had been pointed out by Napoleon Bonaparte, by the Marquis de Custine and Donoso Cortés, among others. Being that Russia is the largest country in the world and is endowed with such totalitarian will, it is well understood that while being dominated by an inverted, satanic religion, like Communism, it could easily wipe out Europe. Even more so if you consider that it has renounced its Christian identity. Louis Veuillot said: “The world will be socialist or Christian, but it will not be liberal. If liberalism does not succumb to Catholicism, which is its negation, it will succumb to socialism, which is its consequence” (cit. In A. Saenz, c).

The Spanish writer Juan Manuel de Prada says in an article: “Dostoevsky summarizes the Russian plan through the mouth of the ascetic Paisius in The Brothers Karamazov: ‘according to certain theories only too clearly formulated in the nineteenth century, the Church ought to be transformed into the State, as though this would be an advance from a lower to a higher form, so as to disappear into it, making way for science, for the spirit of the age, and civilisation. And if the Church resists and is unwilling, some corner will be set apart for her in the State, and even that under control and this will be so everywhere in all modern European countries. But Russian hopes and conceptions demand not that the Church should pass as from a lower into a higher type into the State, but, on the contrary, that the State should end by being worthy to become only the Church and nothing else. So be it! So be it!’ Dostoevsky prophesied the Bolshevik revolution, anticipating its radically anti-Christian and inhumane sign as a divine punishment cast onto Russia for its purification; and he also prophesied the regeneration of the West, which could only be achieved through Russia. And so he wrote in A Writer’s Diary: ‘The fall of your Europe is inevitable (…) All these parliamentary doctrines, all the civic theories professed today, all the accumulated wealth, all of this will be destroyed in an instant and disappear without a trace.’ With these words of Dostoevsky, those who are full of tertulian alfalfa will crave mystical-spiritual ruminations. But in order to defend such ruminations many Russians shed their blood in the Gulag; and some after surviving the Gulag continued to defend these, such as Solzhenitsyn, who in The Oak and the Calf wrote: ‘As for the West, there is no hope; indeed, we should never rely on the West. If we get freedom, we will only owe it to ourselves. If the twentieth century teaches a lesson to humanity, it will be us who will have given it to the West and not the West to us: the excess of well-being and an atmosphere of the contamination of shamelessness have atrophied the will and judgment.'” (“Por qué estamos con Rusia “,abc.es).

After visiting the USSR in the years that it was still communist, Father Sáenz wrote: “The fact that Marxism is a cosmovisional religion, although inverted, gives us hope that once the Soviets convert, they will retain that sense of totality that has nothing to do with totalitarianism, and again embrace the religion, this time the true religion, and not seclude it to the sacristy but instead try to impregnate it with all of their activities”(op. cit.). And he quotes these little known words of the American Bishop Fulton Sheen.:

“When Russia receives the gift of faith, their mission will be that of an apostle for the rest of the world. It will come together in giving faith to the rest of world. Why do we have such hope in Russia? Why must it be the means of evangelizing the nations of the earth? Because Russia has fire, Russia has zeal. God could do something with the hatred of Saul transforming it into love; He could do something with the passion of Magdalena changing it into zeal; but God cannot do anything with those who are neither hot nor cold. These He will spew them out of His mouth.

“The great shame of our world is that we have the truth, but we have no zeal. The Communists have zeal, but do not have the truth. Communism is like a fire which spreads itself all over the world; it is almost like a reverse Pentecost. Someday, instead of bowing ourselves to the earth that fire will start to burn upwards, ascending, in a genuine way like Pentecost, giving people joy, life and peace, instead of hatred, destruction and death. Our Western world lacks that fire. There is no longer profound and selfless love or consecrations to great causes … We are cold, dull, apathetic.”

The German Walter Schubart has written his part in “Europe and the Soul of the East” (1938): “Today, Western Christians, those who are by routine, speak with horror of the Russians fallen deeply, thinking while in their own superiority. Nevertheless, I say: precisely how Russia is today is how it must be to give life to the new faith. You have to fall to climb, and we must fall deeply in order to climb higher. From the depths of evil and torment reckless roads part to the heights of holiness. This is the Christian psychology of guilt. From the most inhuman can come the most elevated. When evil in a paroxysm of crime recognizes itself, it will pass suddenly to the will of regeneration. The Western Christian, Christian by custom, can be fair and honest, but not fruitful. It is bourgeois-and the bourgeoisie is sterile. It lacks the crown of thorns. It is not in the equilibrium of the bourgeois world, but in the midst of the apocalyptic thunder where religion is reborn.” And in another part of the same work: “The West gave humanity the most studied forms of technique, the state organization and communication; but it stole the soul. The mission of Russia is to return it. Russia has precisely the spiritual forces that Europe lost or destroyed. Russia is a piece of Asia and also a member of the Christian community of nations; therein lies the distinctness and uniqueness of its historic mission. Only Russia reunites the conditions for infusing the soul again into a generation ravaged by the desire for power and stagnant in positivism. (…) It seems a bold statement, but it must be done with all resolve: Russia is the only country that can redeem and will redeem Europe, because in respect to the whole problem of life, it takes an opposite stance to that of all European peoples. Precisely from the very foundation of its suffering without example, it will draw a deeper understanding of man and the meaning of life, knowledge, and announce to the nations of the earth. The Russian has for himself psychological conditions today lacking from all Western nations.”

Today Russia is living, after a period of post-communist transition, in a very outstanding rediscovery of traditional religious and cultural roots, asserting itself in the leadership of the court tsarist Vladimir Putin. Facing the abysmal degeneration that occupies the apostate and sodomite West, Russia seems to embody the Christian values ​​abandoned by those defending the natural order, the family and the hierarchical sense of respect for authority and tradition. “Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.” “Only God will judge them,” Putin said in a speech in November 2013.

The post-Christian Western world is being formed today against Russia, because it sees there its antithesis and its “stumbling block”. If it must be removed so that the Antichrist is revealed, and both Rome and the Roman order have been defeated–previously having been undermined and corrupted by the forerunners of the Antichrist (liberalism in society, modernism in the Church, immorality, degeneration and widespread Satanism ), the New World Order can not yet be carried out, because there is something that hinders it. The Roman order of traditional Christian values, though denigrated and not subject to Catholic orthodoxy, exists in Russia today, but to be able to resist completely and victoriously the conversion to Catholicism must occur in this country.

Returning to the errors that Russia will spread, we can see that what began in Russia, then moved to the United States, and in that Heaven warned us that if on the one hand Russia has a providential mission in its plans for chastisement- it will be a chastisement for the sins of the world and serve as a maker of peace and restoration with its conversion, on the other hand those errors that arose there would not be unique to Russia, although the spread of the same errors or their defeat does depend on the conversion of this country. The delay in performing this consecration will bring great punishments. Recall that Sister Lucy received this message in an intimate communication of our Lord:

“Make it known to My ministers, given that they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, they will follow him into misfortune.”

The reference was to Louis XIV, who did consecrate France to the Sacred Heart of Jesus as requested by Our Lord to St. Margaret Mary Alacocque, and later his descendant Louis XVI (who ended up doing it while imprisoned) was dethroned by French Revolution and beheaded in 1793.

That same year, 1931, was the proclamation of the Second Republic in Spain, thus beginning the burning of churches and convents and the satanic anti-Catholic persecution by communists.

The Communist revolution which was orchestrated by the powers that be (which produced the two World Wars) could not bring to an end the religiosity of Russia by forcing atheism. The subsequent attempt of wanting to implant the revolutionary,Western Liberalism after the fall of formal Communism (an attempt made by Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, Illuminati agents both born in 1931), also did not bring results. And just the same as at the time when an obstacle called Stalin had emerged, now there is the new obstacle called Putin, although in an opposite way and therefore more dangerous, because he does not need terror in order to govern his country. For that reason there is no other option than war for those who seek to create the New World Order of the Antichrist. Today things have been inverted and the tables have turned and although most do not notice, the satanic Revolution is embodied in the United States with their Zionist allies and what was formerly known as the “Christian West” has changed hemispheres, reaching towards Russia.

But the salvation of Russia also depends on the consecration to the Immaculate Heart. This is why the Blessed. Virgin told Sister Lucy:

“The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father, in union with all the Bishops of the world, to make the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means. There are so many souls whom the Justice of God condemns for sins committed against Me, that I have come to ask reparation: sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.”

We believe that this is the reason because in the absence of that consecration the next war would be devastating for Russia, with the reign of the Antichrist establishing itself on its ruins and the ruins of all Christendom. However, the promise of the triumph of the Immaculate Heart sustains our hope. Sister Lucy has stated: “The Holy Father will do the consecration, but it will be late. And yet, the Immaculate Heart of Mary will save Russia. This is certain.”

Hence the principal importance of this devotion, even warning of the many positive signs in Russia and its reaction to Western wickedness, are not understood or emphasized. Therefore, as Bishop Richard Williamson says: “However, let us be under no illusion: Russian Orthodoxy welds together religion and patriotism in a not wholly godly mixture, and Orthodoxy is still schismatic by refusing the Papal Supremacy, and heretical by refusing a number of dogmas, so Russians do need to be converted to the truly Universal or Catholic Church. But if Our Lady of Fatima has singled out their country for the Consecration to her Heart, may it not be, not because the Russians are still wicked Communists but because the Russian people’s huge sufferings from their 70 Babylonian years of Communist captivity are calling forth from the always religious depths of “Holy Russia” an upsurge of spiritual vitality which could save the true Church, presently wilting in the West, where Church Authority may still have large numbers but it has little Faith, whilst the Traditional remnant has the true Faith but little by way of numbers and less by way of Authority? God knows how the Western Church also needs conversion!

“May it then be Russia’s smashing of the encirclement in a Third World War leading to its occupation of Europe, which will at last drive the Latin Pope to consecrate Russia to Our Lady’s Heart, as she has so long been asking for in vain? Will at that moment the Russians’ renewed religious vigor save our languishing Catholic Authority and Tradition, whose Truth will in turn cleanse their errors ? If so, then God will once again have “concluded all in unbelief, that He may have mercy on all…How incomprehensible are His judgments, and how unsearchable His ways… To Him be glory for ever” (Rom. XI, 32…36).

Catholics, mainstream and of Tradition, pray your hearts out for the Consecration of Russia to the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of the Mother of God, or “Theotokos” as she is known in the Eastern Church.

READ: (Eleison Comments No. 112, August 29, 2009).

 

CHURCH INFALLIBILITY — IV

Eleison Comments – CCCLVIII (358)

Posted: 23 May 2014 07:24 PM PDT

JMJ

BishopWilliamson
CHURCH INFALLIBILITY — IV

To Cardinal Newman is attributed a wise comment on the 1870 definition of the Pope’s infallibility: “It left him as it found him.” Indeed that definition will have changed nothing in the Pope’s power to teach infallibly, because it belongs to the unchanging nature of God’s true Church that God will protect it from error, at least when its supreme teaching authority is engaged. All such engagement is now called the Church’s “Extraordinary Magisterium”, but only the name can have been new in 1870, just like the name of the “Ordinary Universal Magisterium”. If Vatican I declared the latter also to be infallible, it must also have been so from the beginning of the Church. To discern the realities behind the two names, let us go back to that beginning.

By the time Our Lord ascended to Heaven, he had with his divine infallibility entrusted to his Apostles a body of doctrine which they were to hand down intact to his Church to the end of the world (Mt. XXVIII, 19-20), doctrine which all souls were to believe on pain of damnation (Mk. XVI, 15-16). This Deposit of the Faith, or public Revelation, God was bound to make recognisable and accessible to souls of good will, because obviously the true God could never condemn eternally a soul for refusing to believe in an untruth. By the death of the last Apostle this Deposit was not only infallible but also complete.

Then from the Apostles onwards would God protect all churchmen from ever teaching error ? By no means. Our Lord warned us to beware of “false prophets” (Mt. VII, 15), and St Paul likewise warned against “ravening wolves” (Acts, XX, 29-30). But how could God permit such a danger to his sheep from erring pastors ? Because he wants for his Heaven neither robot pastors nor robot sheep, but pastors and sheep that will both have used the mind and free-will he gave them to teach or follow the Truth. And if a mass of pastors betray, he can always raise a St Athanasius or an Archbishop Lefebvre, for instance, to ensure that his infallible Truth remains always accessible to souls.

Nevertheless that Deposit will be unceasingly exposed to ravening wolves, adding error to it or subtracting truth from it. So how will God still protect it ? By guaranteeing that whenever a Pope engages all four conditions of his full teaching authority to define what does and does not belong to it, he will be divinely protected from error – what we call today the “Extraordinary Magisterium”. (Note how this Extraordinary Magisterium presupposes the infallible Ordinary Magisterium, and can add to it no truth or infallibility, but only a greater certainty for us human beings.) But if the Pope engages any less than all four conditions, then his teaching will be infallible if it corresponds to the Deposit handed down from Our Lord – today called the “Universal Ordinary Magisterium”, but fallible if it is not within that Deposit handed down, or Tradition. Outside of Tradition, his teaching may be true or false.

Thus there is no vicious circle (see EC 357 of last week) because Our Lord authorised Tradition and Tradition authorises the Magisterium. Indeed it is the function of the Pope to declare with authority what belongs to Tradition, and he will be divinely protected from error if he engages his full authority to do so, but he can make declarations outside of Tradition, in which case he will have no such protection. Now the novelties of Vatican II such as religious liberty and ecumenism are way outside of Church Tradition. So they come under neither the Pope’s Ordinary nor his Extraordinary Magisterium, and all the nonsense of all the Conciliar Popes does not oblige any Catholic to become either a liberal or a sedevacantist.

Kyrie eleison.

Tradition is of Popes the measuring-rod Because it came at first only from God.

© 2011-2014 Richard N. Williamson. All Rights Reserved.
A non-exclusive license to print out, forward by email, and/or post this article to the Internet is granted to users who wish to do so provided that no changes are made to the content so reproduced or distributed, to include the retention of this notice with any and all reproductions of content as authorized hereby. Aside from this limited, non-exclusive license, no portion of this article may be reproduced in any other form or by any other electronic or mechanical means without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review, or except in cases where rights to content reproduced herein are retained by its original author(s) or other rights holder(s), and further reproduction is subject to permission otherwise granted thereby.