Calling the Police

Calling the Police
Hello,

May I start by saying I am a long time reader of TIA and thank you very much for your contributions to Catholic Society.

I personally have been seeing the meltdown of the Faith in my own family, as many Catholics have, and this is recently manifesting itself more gravely than ever.

I had only, by the grace of God, found Tradition 7 years ago when I left the Conciliar Church and the novus ordo to attend SSPX Masses here in Tennessee, knowing I was not joining a ‘group’ but attending the very best Mass I could find.

Last year, when I found out that I could be conditionally confirmed by Bishop Williamson, only a 3 hour drive away from us, I opted to make the trek with my family, then only to be ‘forbidden’ by my priest that if I went then he would not be able to ‘guarantee’ a spot for my son at the First Communion ceremony scheduled two weeks following,…(click to finish reading on, Tradition in ActionSite). — > Scroll down page to, Calling The Police.

Father Faure Receives First Admonition

Reblogged from: http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2014/07/05/father-faure-receives-first-admonition/

†  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †  †

Father Faure Receives First Admonition
Jul 5, 2014
Thanks to Centroamerica for the translation:
http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=32589&min=10#p3
of the news item on
http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.ca/2014/07/primera-monicion-contra-el-rp-faure.html
and Father’s reply is here
http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.ca/2014/07/mensaje-del-rp-faure.htmlWhat follows is the English translation.Rev. Fr. Michel Faure received his first canonical admonition today from Fr. Bouchacourt.

Effectively, the impenitent denier of the deicide committed by the Jewish people is now Pontius Pilate to Fr. Faure.

Fr. Faure has only denounced the liberal deviations and treasons coming from Menzingen and remained true to his duties as a Shepard of souls. Our Lord spoke very well when saying that “they will put you of the Synagogues”-St. John 16:2 [emphasis, Adrienne.]

Fr. Bouchacourt: Who is a revolutionary, he who defends the ageless doctrine while defending the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre, or he who attempts to exonerate the Jewish people from the crime of deicide?
[the letter heading and the letter begins]

Dear Rev. Father,

Being responsible for the territory [district] where you have resided and exercised your ministry as a member of our Society until recent times, I am obliged to inform you of this first canonical admonition required by the law and fair governance of all clerical institutions, in order to establish the reproachable facts, reminding you of your acquired obligations and asking you to return to your priestly family without delay, avoiding the painful and inevitable canonical consequences that will result should you insist on remaining in your current situation.

For exceptional reasons that are known to us, you were permitted for many years to exercise your priestly ministry in Paraguay, practically in solitude, maintaining juridical and fraternal bonds not only in the La Reja seminary but also in the South American District.

On February 2nd, 2013 a declaration of several priests, you amongst them, was made public on the internet and was received and interpreted as an open attack on the authority of the Superior General. After this date, you began an irregular ministry, independent of the Society, making yourself an addition to the so-called “resistance” led by other priests who have left the Society.

Since then there have been numerous public declarations confirming not only your support of this revolutionary movement but your effective and continued inciting of the faithful of our chapels to join themselves to this rebellion of priests.

In particular, I would like to point out your interview given on the 5th of December 2013 (the one where you gave your biased version of the 2012 General Chapter, including a divulgence of internal details without respecting sworn confidentiality of all the participants), your designation as “coordinator of the resistance” by H.E. Bishop Richard Williamson, and the December 22, 2013 communications.

Also, equally accessible on the internet are many of your sermons, preached from Mass centers without any reference made to authorities and ostensibly in opposition to the legitimate superiors of the Society, a circumstance that if it hadn’t already been known to those who scour the internet looking for your sermons o[n] YouTube, it would soon become manifest to hear in them the virulent criticisms and constant attacks hurled against *your superiors.

Even though you may have separated yourself voluntarily and unilaterally from the Society and all that that entails, and you are found to be exercising in actuality a ministry independent from its structure, you do not remain free because of this from fulfilling the serious obligations and solemn commitments that result from your priestly ordination and its perpetual oblation [he means here that because he joined the resistance he still has responsibilities like the continual sacrifice of being a priest and implies that by joining the resistance Fr. Faure is not fulfilling these responsibilities as if intentionally]. In virtue of these obligations and commitments, I make this first canonical admonition in conformity with the law, requesting that you reintegrate yourself into the Society, giving you the option of choosing between residence in the Santiago de Chile priory or the retreat house in Montgardin, France.

A second admonition will follow this one in 15 business days if you do not fulfill the condition required or if you don’t make your intention known to abide by [the requirements] as much as is feasible and without much delay. After another period of 15 business days if you have not did your part to conform [to this admonition], the Superior General will initiate the expulsion process prescribed by canon law, considering in particular: 1) that all clerics are obliged to show respect and obedience to their superiors, 2) that the disobedience pertinent to the legitimate mandates of the superiors in grave matters and scandal are the reasons for the expulsion, 3) that the Society’s own laws establish obstinacy and disobedience as reasons for expulsion, y 4) that the very same law considers the public dissemination of litigation to be a supplementary [additional] crime. [so this very post now I must consider that Fr. Bouchacourt believes that I am assisting Fr. Faure’s “supplementary crime”!]

In so far as it is sound, your rights of defense- if this is what you prefer- can be communicated directly to the Superior General.

I implore God and the Most Holy Virgin, dear father, that you become aware of your unjust and false accusations, that you repair the scandal caused and that very soon you return to your priestly family, in which you have been, until recent times, a universally respected member and labored so much for. Tantus labor non sit cassus.

Fr. Bouchacourt
Note
* I translated “sus superiores” as “your superiors”. The actual context does not indicate if he meant Fr. Faure’s superiors or “the faithful’s superiors”i.e “their superiors”. “Sus superiores” can be both “your superiors” or “their superiors”. I assume that Fr. Bouchacourt knows that although I have attended Society Masses all my life, neither him nor the SG have ever been my superior as a layman.

FAREWELL, SSPX.

JMJ

“I accept with sincere belief the doctrine of faith as handed
down to us from the Apostles by the orthodox Fathers,
always in the same sense and with the same interpretation.” – Pope St. Pius X

“The true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries
nor innovators, but men of tradition.” – Pope St. Pius X


BishopWilliamson

FAREWELL, SSPX.    Number CCCLV (355)   —    3rd May 2014

http://www.dinoscopus.org/index.html#thisweek

Bad news from France : the 40-year fight for the Faith by the Society of St Pius X against the modernists in Rome is virtually over. Oh, the Society’s priories, schools, seminaries and associated convents and monasteries will continue to function, to provide for at least a while valid sacraments and decent doctrine, maintaining all the appearances of Tradition, but the essential fight for the complete Faith will be censored, or self-censored, out of existence. It looks like being only a limited number of priests more that will have the understanding of Archbishop Lefebvre’s work and the necessary courage to break ranks and take to the hills.

The news is that the modernists in Rome are offering to the Society a « recognition by tolerance » without the need for any formal agreement or signed document such as raised within the SSPX so much opposition to a deal with Rome in the spring and early summer of 2012. Here is the essence of how the Society’s Second Assistant, Fr. Alain Nély, expressed it, with enthusiasm, to two members of religious Orders three months ago : « The solution for the SSPX will be its unilateral recognition by Rome…we will not be asked to sign anything…to see how things evolve…we shall see. »

To prevent such a revelation from spreading, the Society’s Superior General wrote to the two religious concerned that they had misunderstood Fr. Nély’s remarks because there was no kind of « agreement » in view. Of course not. Therein lies the cunning of the proposed « recognition » without signature. It will allow numbers of SSPX priests to pretend that nothing will have changed so that they can continue their ministry just as before. Thus, as reported, Bishop Fellay himself recently told SSPX seminarians in Zaitzkofen : « There is no question of signing any agreement, etc., etc.» However, ten minutes later, « But if Rome proposes a recognition of tolerance for us, that’s a different matter, that would be very good. »

And so there is every likelihood, sooner rather than later, that a large number of SSPX priests will docilely follow their official leaders into the embrace of the loving modernists in Rome, an embrace that will become over time as tight as necessary to stifle any remaining effort to fight against that deadly modernism which is killing off the official Church and putting millions of souls on the path to Hell. In retrospect one may guess that Bishop Fellay has worked skilfully with the Romans towards this embrace for at least the last 15 years. Bishop de Galarreta has seen what is at stake, but has thrown in his lot with Bishop Fellay. Bishop Tissier also sees clearly the deadly threat to the Archbishop’s work, but he does not see the need to follow the Archbishop’s example of putting the Faith before all normal rules of obedience and unity.

And so, dear friends, if we wish to keep the fullness of the Faith and help others to do so, we must at least internally take to the hills. Have no fear. Keep a cool head. There is no need to lose heart, or despair. God does not change, and the fight for his cause becomes more glorious than ever. Priests, keep watch, and above all do not deceive yourselves that nothing in the Society is changing. It has already essentially changed. Lay-folk, keep watch also, and pray, and God will give you the leaders and priests of your prayers. In God we trust, and in his Blessed Mother.

Kyrie eleison.

Catholics, when you see how Rome fulfils
A cry for recognition, take to the hills !

————->>>Read, “The Oath Against Modernism” by Pope St. Pius X:
000
000

Our Lady of Fatima, ora pro nobis!